November 15, 2024-As Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s controversial anti-fluoride stance gains attention, some GOP lawmakers, particularly those with dental backgrounds, are pushing back hard. Kennedy, who has made headlines with his claims about the dangers of fluoride, recently posted on X (formerly Twitter) that the Trump administration would order the removal of fluoride from all U.S. water systems starting on January 20, 2025.
Kennedy’s assertion—describing fluoride as an industrial waste linked to numerous health issues like arthritis, bone cancer, and cognitive decline—has raised alarms. His remarks fly in the face of decades of scientific consensus supporting fluoride’s safety and effectiveness in preventing tooth decay. But the more startling aspect of his post wasn’t just the unsubstantiated health claims, but the indication that the incoming Trump administration could fully embrace his anti-fluoride agenda. Trump had previously promised to “let Kennedy go wild on health,” and it seems that commitment may soon take shape.
While Trump’s advisors have largely been met with deference from congressional Republicans, Kennedy’s proposal has prompted strong reactions from lawmakers who understand the importance of fluoride to public health—particularly those with backgrounds in dentistry.
Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a former dentist, was quick to express his skepticism about Kennedy’s plan. “I’m tempted to give you a smart-ass answer,” Simpson told reporters, but then emphasized his serious concerns, pointing to the vast body of evidence supporting the benefits of fluoridation in preventing cavities and promoting dental health.
For many GOP lawmakers with dental training, Kennedy’s rhetoric is more than just a passing political issue—it’s a threat to the oral health of millions of Americans. Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), also a former pharmacist, expressed similar concerns, saying, “This is not just misinformation; it’s dangerous for public health. If fluoride were removed from our water supply, we’d be looking at a huge increase in dental cavities across the country.”
Despite these warnings, Kennedy has continued to push his message, often invoking broader health fears to support his claims. His opposition to fluoride is part of a larger, more controversial stance on vaccines and other public health measures, making him a divisive figure in the political arena. Yet, for many in the medical and dental communities, his push against fluoride is seen as a deeply misguided effort that could undo decades of progress in dental health.
“If this plan goes through,” Rep. Simpson said, “it would be good for the dental profession, though. A lot more cavities to fill. But it would be disastrous for American families.”
With Republican lawmakers like Simpson and Carter already speaking out, it’s clear that Kennedy’s fluoride crusade will face significant opposition—even within his own political camp. Whether this movement gains momentum or fades into the political background will depend on how much influence the incoming administration gives to Kennedy’s unscientific claims.
Related topics:
